Home Markets The loss of shine in London’s stock market is a liquidity problem

The loss of shine in London’s stock market is a liquidity problem

by [email protected]
0 comments

Unlock Editor’s Digest for free

Fears that a rush of listed companies would abandon London for New York turned out to be unfounded. However, there is no doubt that a trickle is forming, and if left unchecked, it could become a nuisance.

Machinery hire company Ashteed became the latest FTSE 100 member to announce relocation plans this month, following gambling group Flutter and building materials manufacturer CRH. Adding in delistings, the total number of exits from the London Stock Exchange this year is approaching 90, the worst exit since the financial crisis.

In some ways, the battle to keep London listed is more emotional than factual. Many of the popular arguments for leaving the EU, which have gained momentum since the 2016 Brexit vote, are weaker than they seem.

First, leaving London is not a shortcut to skyrocketing stock prices. LSEG CEO David Schwimmer says the idea that U.S. companies are overvalued is a “myth,” as analysis by UBS and the Financial Times found similar findings. . A large fish in a small pond can increase its rarity value.

Second, raising the bar isn’t the only way to attract deep-pocketed U.S. investors. Certainly, inclusion in a widely tracked index such as the S&P 500 attracts capital flows, but a New York listing alone is not enough, and most stocks also require a major presence in the United States. And it’s not difficult for motivated U.S. investors to approach high-quality foreign companies. Seven of the 10 largest groups in the FTSE 100 are already majority-owned by US investors. Ashtead owns nearly 60% of U.S. stocks, the same level as U.S.-listed CRH, according to Bloomberg data.

Some content could not be loaded. Please check your internet connection or browser settings.

What London cannot compete with is liquidity. The easier a stock is to trade, the easier it is for investors to take large positions and the lower the cost of capital for companies. Although data can be sliced ​​and diced to lessen the severity of the problem, CFOs considering a switch will want to draw on the experience of their direct predecessors.

Line chart of rolling 10-day average trading volume ('000s) showing the sharp increase in Flutter trading volume during the listing transition.

From that perspective, things don’t look good for Britain. Since joining the New York Stock Exchange in January, around 1.3 million U.S.-listed Flutter shares have changed hands each day, more than double the number of shares traded daily in the U.K. a year ago. CRH’s daily trading volume in the US is 2.8 times its pre-transition average. And the effect appears to be lasting. Plumbing and heating sales company Ferguson, which made the switch in mid-2022, maintains its average volume in the US is about 1.7 times that in the UK.

Although there is unlikely to be a single quick fix, there may be some adjustments that managers and policy makers can make to increase liquidity and maintain London’s competitiveness. UK stamp duty is one distortion to consider. But it’s important to have clear insight into what’s really holding companies back and what’s not.

[email protected]

You may also like

Leave a Comment

About Us

Welcome to CEO Times, your trusted source for the latest news, insights, and trends in the world of business and entrepreneurship. At CEO Times, we are dedicated to empowering aspiring entrepreneurs, seasoned business leaders, and everyone in between with the knowledge and inspiration they need to succeed.

Copyright ©️ 2024 CEO Times | All rights reserved.